Post by sdf4gsdg on Aug 7, 2023 8:47:15 GMT
In 2019, the United States initiated the "Transparency" project, a collaboration between the Inter-American Development Bank and the Office of the Attorney General of Colombia. The project involved creating a test model cloud to explore the feasibility of using blockchain technology, specifically the Ethereum software. In 2020, a block of purchases was successfully completed under Colombia's state nutrition program for underprivileged children (Programa de Alimentación Escolar).
The project aimed to study the potential and limitations of blockchain technology in combating corruption in public procurement. Different data access models, including exclusive (permissioned) and inclusive (permissionless) schemes, were tested to assess their effectiveness.
Is corruption inevitable within the blockchain?
The report authors proposed a hybrid scheme that combines inclusive and exclusive models, which was recommended in a request for proposals system model.
Furthermore, the World Economic Forum (WEF) released a comprehensive research report for review, suggesting its implementation in countries combating corruption schemes. The report also provides extensive information on corruption, blockchain, and smart contracts.
While the study authors propose using blockchain to address corrupt practices like lack of transparency and biased procurement documentation, it is important to note that these issues can also be addressed through improvements to existing electronic public procurement systems. Surprisingly, these studies do not mention this alternative approach.
Additionally, certain corrupt practices such as supplier collusion and bribery cannot be solely prevented by technological solutions. The blockchain's potential lies in its ability to counter corrupt practices associated with improper advances and subcontracting through contract payments. However, this area requires further research and development, especially concerning the use of cryptocurrencies.
Will blockchain implementation eradicate corruption in the future?
As evident, there is no "magic pill" in blockchain technology to completely eliminate corruption. Corruption schemes can still exert influence, albeit to varying degrees.
However, it is undeniable that smart contracts and blockchain have made significant strides in combating corruption worldwide. The hesitation of many governments to embrace digitalization becomes apparent, particularly in third-world countries where corruption persists, causing suffering among the population while the crypto industry is either in its infancy or non-existent.
Lado Okhotnikov, CEO of Meta-force.space (formerly Forsage.io), emphasizes that the essence of blockchain is a ledger, ensuring all participants possess an identical ledger that remains constantly synchronized. This feature guarantees an honest settlement system. If a tender is announced with conditions recorded in the ledger, only those who genuinely comply with these conditions can participate. However, challenges arise during the stage of entering conditions into the ledger. It becomes crucial to ascertain which conditions were published in the ledger through smart contracts and which were concealed, along with the reasons behind such actions.
In conclusion, formal tender processes conducted solely through blockchain technology do not provide a guarantee against corruption. A comprehensive understanding of the conditions published in the ledger via smart contracts, including any hidden aspects, is necessary to address the corruption component effectively.
The project aimed to study the potential and limitations of blockchain technology in combating corruption in public procurement. Different data access models, including exclusive (permissioned) and inclusive (permissionless) schemes, were tested to assess their effectiveness.
Is corruption inevitable within the blockchain?
The report authors proposed a hybrid scheme that combines inclusive and exclusive models, which was recommended in a request for proposals system model.
Furthermore, the World Economic Forum (WEF) released a comprehensive research report for review, suggesting its implementation in countries combating corruption schemes. The report also provides extensive information on corruption, blockchain, and smart contracts.
While the study authors propose using blockchain to address corrupt practices like lack of transparency and biased procurement documentation, it is important to note that these issues can also be addressed through improvements to existing electronic public procurement systems. Surprisingly, these studies do not mention this alternative approach.
Additionally, certain corrupt practices such as supplier collusion and bribery cannot be solely prevented by technological solutions. The blockchain's potential lies in its ability to counter corrupt practices associated with improper advances and subcontracting through contract payments. However, this area requires further research and development, especially concerning the use of cryptocurrencies.
Will blockchain implementation eradicate corruption in the future?
As evident, there is no "magic pill" in blockchain technology to completely eliminate corruption. Corruption schemes can still exert influence, albeit to varying degrees.
However, it is undeniable that smart contracts and blockchain have made significant strides in combating corruption worldwide. The hesitation of many governments to embrace digitalization becomes apparent, particularly in third-world countries where corruption persists, causing suffering among the population while the crypto industry is either in its infancy or non-existent.
Lado Okhotnikov, CEO of Meta-force.space (formerly Forsage.io), emphasizes that the essence of blockchain is a ledger, ensuring all participants possess an identical ledger that remains constantly synchronized. This feature guarantees an honest settlement system. If a tender is announced with conditions recorded in the ledger, only those who genuinely comply with these conditions can participate. However, challenges arise during the stage of entering conditions into the ledger. It becomes crucial to ascertain which conditions were published in the ledger through smart contracts and which were concealed, along with the reasons behind such actions.
In conclusion, formal tender processes conducted solely through blockchain technology do not provide a guarantee against corruption. A comprehensive understanding of the conditions published in the ledger via smart contracts, including any hidden aspects, is necessary to address the corruption component effectively.